The Gardasil Vaccine is dangerous and ineffective!

August 31, 20140 Comments

Hello, with the recent death of yet another girl, this time from Milwaukee, from the HPV vaccine I felt that you should know the facts behind the facts regarding this dangerous vaccine. Please read on….


It has been revealed, much of it through the US governments own health agencies, that the Gardasil vaccine is both dangerous and ineffective.[1]

FDA documents obtained by Judicial Watch reveal that, within a 16 month period, there were 16 deaths (4 suicides), 789 “serious reports” and 239 cases of permanent disability resulting from the vaccine. As of April 2011, over 20,000 adverse events, 90 of them deaths, have been reported to the government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in connection with the vaccine.[2]

For starters, the HPV vaccine Gardasil, which is being vigorously pushed on unsuspecting young girls and women to theoretically guard against cervical cancer has never been proven to actually prevent cancer. On the contrary, evidence suggests that under certain circumstances the vaccine increases your risk of precancerous lesions by nearly 45 percent, and an ever increasing number of girls are being seriously injured by this unnecessary vaccine.[3]

Some additional facts are that over 90% of cases it goes away on its own within two years, only 26% of young girls and women have been exposed to any HPV strain, only 2% have been exposed to strains 16 or 18 the only two that Gardasil and Cervarix protect against, condoms confer a much greater level of protection, about 70% less chance of becoming infected, than vaccines.[4]

Dr. Diane Harper was a leading expert responsible for the Phase II and Phase III safety and effectiveness studies which secured the approval of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines, Gardasil™ and Cervarix™. Dr. Harper also authored many of the published, scholarly papers about the vaccines. After getting approval she started to publically question the vaccine’s use in young girls. She had this to sayat the 4th International Conference on Vaccines which took place in Reston, Virginia.:

Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States. In fact, 70% of all HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in two years. Harper also mentioned the safety angle. All trials of the vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above, despite them currently being marketed for 9-year-olds. So far, 15,037 girls have reported adverse side effects from Gardasil™ alone to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), and this number only reflects parents who underwent the hurdles required for reporting adverse reactions. At the time of writing, 44 girls are officially known to have died from these vaccines. The reported side effects include Guillian Barré Syndrome (paralysis lasting for years, or permanently — sometimes eventually causing suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain inflammation. Parents are usually not made aware of these risks. Dr. Harper, the vaccine developer, claimed that she was speaking out, so that she might finally be able to sleep at night.’ About eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have HPV at some stage of their life,’ Harper says. ’Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself. But in those cases where it doesn’t, and isn’t treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer.

Although these two vaccines are marketed as protection against cervical cancer, this claim is purely hypothetical. Studies have proven:

There is no demonstrated relationship between the condition being vaccinated for and the rare cancers that the vaccine might prevent, but it is marketed to do that nonetheless. In fact, there is no actual evidence that the vaccine can prevent any cancer. From the manufacturers own admissions, the vaccine only works on 4 strains out of 40 for a specific venereal disease that dies on its own in a relatively short period, so the chance of it actually helping an individual is about the same as the chance of her being struck by a meteorite.[5]

In a separate interview she noted: A truly effective HPV vaccine would need to remain efficacious for 15 years to prevent cervical cancer in women and also, that we would have to vaccinate every single 11 year old girl in the United States for the next 60 years to have any measurable effect on rates of cervical cancer.[6]

She added in an interview with CBS News:

If we vaccinate 11 year olds and the protection doesn’t last … we’ve put them at harm from side effects, small but real, for no benefit,” says Dr. Harper. “The benefit to public health is nothing, there is no reduction in cervical cancers, they are just postponed, unless the protection lasts for at least 15 years, and over 70% of all sexually active females of all ages are vaccinated.

The risks of serious adverse events including death reported after Gardasil use in (the JAMA article by CDC’s Dr. Barbara Slade) were 3.4/100,000 doses distributed,” Harper tells CBS NEWS.  ”The rate of serious adverse events on par with the death rate of cervical cancer.  Gardasil has been associated with at least as many serious adverse events as there are deaths from cervical cancer developing each year. Indeed, the risks of vaccination are underreported… How does a parent value that information,” said Harper.

Imagine if you can the consequences of vaccinating every 11 yo girl in the US. Based on the VAERS reports the carnage would be monstrous. All of this excessive vaccination is for a disease that in first world countries is a non-issue because virtually nobody dies from cervical cancer in the western world.

According to the Blaylock Wellness Report cervical cancer is largely a disease of poor nutrition and that with proper nutrition, vitamins and supplements dysplastic cervical cells revert back to normal.

Studies have now shown that women with an HPV infection that have a,

… high viral load (many viruses in their blood) can lower the risk of developing a cervical cancer condition by 79 percent if they take multivitamins. This means they have a significantly lower risk of ever developing cervical cancer.[7]

Even the National Cancer Institute has stated that,

The majority of women clear the HPV virus from their bodies naturally. Cervical cancer is nearly 100% curable when detected early. In America cervical cancer deaths account for 0.65 % of all cancer deaths.[8] [Emphasis mine]

Reality check: please note that the percentage quoted is less than 1% of all cancer deaths. To keep this in perspective I looked up non-melanoma skin cancer deaths because they are some of the least aggressive, easily cured, cancers there are. An estimated 3,170 deaths from nonmelanoma skin cancers will occur in the US in 2013.Overall total deaths from all cancer in North America is 638,300 per year. This equals 0.496% of all cancer deaths. Cervical cancer deaths are just a tad higher at 0.65%.

From the CDC website we find for 2009 3,909 women in the United States died from cervical cancer. That’s less than the 4,280 pedestrians run over by cars and busses in the United States in 2010 but I don’t see anyone clamoring for improvements in pedestrian safety.

That means a lot of vaccine for so little threat. So why the push to vaccinate everyone? Furthermore, there is no data on women previously exposed to HPV viral strains and subsequently getting a vaccination. Under those conditions some scientists feel that it may promote cervical cancer rather than prevent it. We just do not know what could happen at this point. Only time will tell.

The FDA licensed Gardasil back in 2006 and it is now recommended as a routine vaccination for girls and women between the ages of 9-26 in the US. In 2011 the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices also voted to recommend giving the HPV vaccine to males between the ages of 11 and 21. The second HPV vaccine, Cervarix, was licensed in 2009.

In September 2012 a study was published by a Canadian research team[9] which while stopping short of condemning the HPV vaccine, put the manufacturers to task and called them out on a number of overly positive assumptions regarding the use of this vaccine. Basically what they said was that industry data was cherry picked, the effectiveness was overstated and completely unproven. The safety profile was questioned as being based on “highly flawed” safety trials and is “contrary to accumulating evidence from vaccine safety surveillance databases and case reports which continue to link HPV vaccine to serious adverse outcomes (including death and permanent disabilities).”[10]

Today, six years after licensure, we STILL have absolutely no proof, not a shred of actual evidence, indicating that Gardasil actually prevents cancer in the long-term and/or reduces cervical cancer mortality. What we have instead is tens ofthousands of adverse event reports and 122 deaths, as of mid-August [2012].[11]

Just last year (2013) an article published in the journal Infectious Agent Cancer, titled HPV vaccines and cancer prevention, science versus activism, the rationale behind current worldwide HPV vaccination programs is called into question.

The authors stated,

Careful analysis of HPV vaccine pre- and post-licensure data shows however that both of these premises are at odds with factual evidence and are largely derived from significant misinterpretation of available data…In spite of much unwarranted and premature optimism, the fact is however that HPV vaccines have not thus far prevented a single case of cervical cancer (let alone cervical cancer death)

They continue:

Similarly, the notion that HPV vaccines have an impressive safety profile can only be supported by highly flawed design of safety trials…and is contrary to accumulating evidence from vaccine safety surveillance databases and case reports which continue to link HPV vaccination to serious adverse outcomes (including death and permanent disabilities). For example, compared to all other vaccines in the U.S. vaccination schedule, Gardasil alone is associated with 61% of all serious adverse reactions (including 63.8% of all deaths and 81.2% cases of permanent disability) in females younger than 30 years of age.

Although a report to a vaccine safety surveillance system does not by itself prove that the vaccine caused an adverse reaction, the unusually high frequency of adverse reactions related to HPV vaccines reported worldwide, as well as their consistent pattern (i.e. nervous system-related disorders rank the highest in frequency), points to a potentially causal relationship. Furthermore, matching the data from vaccine surveillance databases is an increasing number of case reports documenting similar serious adverse reactions associated with HPV vaccine administration, with nervous system and autoimmune disorders being the most frequently reported in the medical literature.[12]

Yet, health officials from the CDC and FDA cannot sing high enough praises for this vaccine which under the best of circumstances possibly (yet never proven) prevents one of the most highly preventable and least dangerous cancers a person can get.

Following on the heels of the Canadian report which blasted the junk science backing Gardasil the Wall street Journal published a Merck and Co’s study which predictably found no serious adverse effects from the vaccine. This was put on the “Fountain of Truth” WebMD site as well with concerned commentary from a Mercola article.

There’s not a single mention of the Canadian review. Likewise, WebMD’s HPV page…which was reviewed by Kimball Johnson, MD on August 13, 2012, he plainly states: No serious HPV vaccine side effects have been found, although fainting spells following injection have been reported in teens and young adults. Sometimes soreness occurs at the injection site.[13]


Who is this fella, this Kimball Johnson MD? And why does he have two last names? Would you take me more seriously if I was Chris Christopher MD? Well, forget it-that’s two first names anyway. Eitherway, even if he had two first names for last names, he didn’t seem to do a very good review. Either that or he has a reason not to mention all of the serious adverse drug reactions from one of the more dangerous vaccines we currently use. Or is he just stupid? Since stupidity is a now a virtue he could very well be playing the dim-witted card.

As of August 13, 2012, VAERS has received 119 reports of death following HPV vaccination,as well as:

  • 894 reports of disability
  • 517 life-threatening adverse events
  • 9,889 emergency room visits
  • 2,781 hospitalizations

And WebMD had the gall to misinform the public by stating that there have been NO serious side effects associated with HPV vaccination! What parent would not consider even the remote potential for permanent disability and/or death worthy of at least a brief mention?[14]

Did they honestly forget to mention the nearly 15,000 adverse events reported in 2012 which included 119 deaths? Now it’s true that none of these cases has been proven to be caused by the vaccine. All we can say that it was associated with the vaccine when the person received it. Association not causation. To get causation we need controlled trials. Nonetheless the data is still very important and very meaningful. If 20,000 deaths were associated with a vaccine let’s say in the first year it came out it would probably be pulled-so the data is important. My question is why push a vaccine that has many reported problems real or not when nothing can be gained that isn’t accomplished with good nutrition and a PAP smear?

Good question Shadrach, we know the answer because we are dealing with an industry that may suffer from moral turpitude. When combined with the corruption we sometimes see with our governing bodies it often fosters contempt for patient suffering. Officially there is a dogmatic defiance toward anyone who suggests a vaccine is harmful. I think this potentially leads to indifference to patient harms in an us versus them attitude.

Did I mention ovarian failure? Gee I almost forgot that the prestigious British Medical Journal or BMJ has published a case report of a healthy 16 year old girl from Australia who developed premature ovarian failure and went into menopause.[15] There were no other possible associations except that she had had the series of Gardasil vaccinations.

The diagnostic tasks were to determine the reason for her secondary amenorrhoea and then to investigate for possible causes of the premature ovarian failure identified. Although the cause is unknown in 90% of cases, the remaining chief identifiable causes of this condition were excluded. Premature ovarian failure was then notified as a possible adverse event following this vaccination…This event could hold potential implications for population health and prompts further inquiry.

Whether this is due to the vaccine additives polysorbate 80, and L-histidine or the vaccine itself remains to be seen. Polysorbate 80 apparently can injure female reproductive organs as seen in a rat model.[16]

Polysorbate 80 may possibly carry inflammatory molecules like aluminum across the blood brain barrier (BBB). In fact, polysorbate 80 is used for just that purpose when doctors need to transport medicines across the BBB.

Even mainstream, conservative doctors should be a little offended. As far as indifference to patient harms goes you would think that the most often referenced website for community standard medicine, WebMD, would give the layperson at least some information regarding a vaccine and its potential complications yet they failed to mention ANY side effects or adverse drug reactions outside of the candy-coated skin irritation and things of that nature.

That’s just wrong I think we all can agree? It’s lie by omission, a technique utilized daily by the media in our new age of “The Truth Emergency” (search truth emergency at and by the presstitutes-a term coined by Gerald Celente a tough, Bronx born Italian and trends forecaster-one of the good guys. Check out his website at if you want to know what’s going to happen.

Web MD and others like them provide more of a pro-industry, one sided view of the data surrounding an unnecessary and possibly dangerous vaccine without so much as a snivel. Their actions offer a green light to moms and daughters everywhere that this vaccine is completely safe. This serves as a warning to the millions out there reading and (trusting I might add) their advice. This is just another example of how we all must be very aware of “business as usual,” to read alternative information that is honest and dedicated (that’s me). Always question why do I or my child need this medication. More often than not you don’t need it.


Recently, (Jan. 2014), a disturbing article was published in Autoimmunity Reviews titled, On the relationship between human papilloma virus vaccine and autoimmune disease. In it the authors Paolo Pellegrino et al noted that,

Along with the introduction of the HPV vaccines, several cases of onset or exacerbations of autoimmune diseases following the vaccine shot have been reported in the literature and pharmacovigilance databases, triggering concerns about its safety.[17]

After a review of the available literature they listed the autoimmune diseases most likely linked to the HPV vaccine. These are associations NOT causations the authors note:

  • Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and other demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system
  • Multiple sclerosis (MS)
  • Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS)
  • Primary ovarian failure (POF)
  • IgA bullosus dermatitis
  • Henoch-Schonlein purpura
  • Cutaneous vasculitis
  • Kikuch-Fujimoto disease
  • Erythema multiforme
  • Acute cerebral ataxia
  • Immune thrombocytopenic purpura

In a related article published in 2009 in the Journal of Experimental Therapeutics and Oncology entitled Quantifying the possible cross-reactivity risk of an HPV16 vaccine.

The authors stated: we quantified the actual and theoretical risks of anti-HPV16 vaccination, and defined the potential disease spectrum derived from concomitant cross-reactions with the human organism.

Concluding: The number of viral matches and their locations make the occurrence of side autoimmune cross-reactions in the human host following HPV16-based vaccination almost unavoidable.[18] [Emphasis mine]

Should you wish to research this in more depth you can go to

[1]Gary Null. Gardasil a case of contamination.( 04/23/2012

[2] IBID p 5.

[3] ( Leading Vaccine Doctor States Cancer Linked to Polio Vaccine. P. 1

[4] IBID p.4

[5] Lead Developer Of HPV Vaccines Comes Clean, Warns Parents & Young Girls It’s All A Giant Deadly Scam. The Daily Sheeple – http://www.thedailysheeple.comPosted By Secrets of the Fed On January 6, 2014. In Controlling the Herd,Editor’s Choice,Featured,General,Headlines & Head Lies,Health,News,Science

[6] Gary Null. Gardasil a case of contamination.( 04/23/2012 p 7

[7] Russell Blaylock, MD. The Blaylock Wellness Report. Nov. 2010 Vol 7, No. 11. p.9

[8] (HPV Infection Facts – National Vaccine Information Center, National Vaccine Information Center. ( 04/23/2012

[9] Current Pharmaceutical Design 2012 Sep 24. [Epub ahead of print]

[10] ( 12/01/2012

[11] IBID

[12] ( 02/18/2014

[13] 12/01/2012

[14] IBID

[15] BMJ Reports 2012, Deirdre Therese Little, Harvey Rodrick Grenville Ward, doi:10.1136/bcr-2012-006879

[16] Food Chem Toxicol. 1993 Mar;31(3):183-90.

[17] ( Original DOI: 02/17/2014

[18] ( 02/17/2014

Filed in: BlogVaccines
Tagged with:

About the Author ()

Christopher Rasmussen MD, MS is Founder and Professor at AdaptiveTCM where helps Traditional Chinese Medicine Practitioners treat complex patients with confidence through providing online CEUs and research. Dr. Rasmussen is currently writing a comprehensive, preventive medicine book, with an emphasis on inflammatory components of disease prevalent in today's patients.

Back to Top